[sdiy] Audio taper pots
Mattias Rickardsson
mr at analogue.org
Fri Aug 24 21:45:22 CEST 2012
I think it's extremely important to avoid linear scales on parameters
that are not experienced linearly - mainly since it's so easy.
Otherwise you'll end up with something that reminds of the hopeless
response of the volume sliders on cheap old plastic radios... where
almost everything useful is within the first 20%. :-)
Shunt it like Mark suggested, probably with an even smaller resistor
(around 1/5 of the pot value). This is all you need:
http://www.geofex.com/article_folders/potsecrets/logpot.gif
/mr
On 24 August 2012 21:30, mark verbos <mverbos at earthlink.net> wrote:
> I think it's important, but you could use tapering resistors.
> i.e. run a resistor from the wiper to ground that is about double the value of the pot.
>
> http://www.geofex.com/article_folders/potsecrets/potscret.htm
>
> Mark
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Aug 24, 2012, at 2:19 PM, David G Dixon wrote:
>
>>> How important is it to use audio taper pots for audio
>>> attenuators? I have a mixer design that needs linear pots for
>>> panning. Can I use linear pots for the attenuators? It would
>>> mean stocking just one pot, and at 1000 minimum quantity I'd
>>> like to avoid needed 2 pots.
>>
>> IMHO, it's not important at all. I use Linear pots on all mixer inputs, and
>> they work very well.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Synth-diy mailing list
>> Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
>> http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>
> _______________________________________________
> Synth-diy mailing list
> Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
> http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list