[sdiy] Using analog for physical modeling

[Harry Bissell]

Locating your studio within 50ft of Niagara Falls might be a noise simulation option... 

Just because BBDs may be a good choice for TZF, does not mean they don't suck...

H^) harry


----- Original Message -----
From: Richard Wentk <richard at wentk.com>
To: Tim Parkhurst <tim.parkhurst at gmail.com>
Cc: Harry Bissell <harrybissell at wowway.com>, synthdiy diy <synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl>
Sent: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:39:31 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: [sdiy] Using analog for physical modeling

Is there a good model for BBD noise+distortion that could be emulated digitally? 

I've never seen one - but that could be because an accurate model might not be trivial.

Richard

On 21 Sep 2011, at 18:34, Tim Parkhurst wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Harry Bissell <harrybissell at wowway.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Digital delays tend not to have a very wide range of clock frequency, so the through
>> zero flanging might be (can I say this outloud?) inferior to a BBD approach.
>> 
> 
> Alright, mister! Who are you, and what have you done with Harry?!?
> 
> 
> Tim (BBDoppelgänger) Servo
> -- 
> "Sire, the church of God is an anvil that has worn out many hammers."
> - H.L. Hastings
> _______________________________________________
> Synth-diy mailing list
> Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
> http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy


-- 
Harry Bissell & Nora Abdullah 4eva