[sdiy] New member

[ze man]

Thanks for all the links guys, I'll be checking them out.

My main goal is double-sided:
-One is to explore a R&D approach to developing something, using engineering 
tools, for design, simulation & testing and be perhaps able to reach 
DSI-like results (wishful thinking).
-The other would be more in the DIY approach  of hands-on with soldering 
using already available feasible projects, to being a small army of studio 
gear ;-)

And  yes, I agree with the music/fun ratio being the most important, 
regardless of gear. Albeit some artists, like this:

 http://createdigitalmusic.com/2011/09/good-listening-chris-randalls-particulate-pulses-with-obsessively-constructed-sound-apple-ii-nostalgia/#more-20560are returning to HW :-)--------------------------------------------------From: "Dave Manley" <dlmanley at sonic.net>Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2011 5:51 PMTo: <synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl>Subject: Re: [sdiy] New member> On 9/17/2011 11:22 PM, Matthew Smith wrote:>> Quoth ze man at 18/09/11 13:36...> t. So I guess you'd not call it "Moog Complete," if that's the synthversion of "Turing Complete" ;-)>>>> I'm using a Spartan3AN for this to cut down on support components. I'llbe doing the build using the Xilinx ISE WebPack, but all the Verilog will bewritten using vi, the Only True Editor ;-)>> </flamebait>>> Here's something to consider:http://www.veripool.org/wiki/verilog-mode/Intro>> Verilog-mode is very handy for automating much of the drudgery of codingin Verilog.  It runs natively in Emacs.>> There are ways to make it work with Vi(m), but they're just one more wayof trying to make Vi a pale substitute for a true editor.>> :-p :-P>> -dave> _______________________________________________> Synth-diy mailing list> Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl> http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy>