[sdiy] OT: questions on TYPEDEF STRUCT

[Jerry Gray-Eskue]

As long as you are not "keystroke wise and debug foolish", using longer
names that clarify the code are worthwhile, debugging code that is not
clearly written can eat a lot of time.

Just my 2 cents

- Jerry

-----Original Message-----
From: synth-diy-bounces at dropmix.xs4all.nl
[mailto:synth-diy-bounces at dropmix.xs4all.nl] On Behalf Of Neil Johnson
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2011 10:27 AM
To: dan snazelle
Cc: Synth-Diy diy
Subject: Re: [sdiy] OT: questions on TYPEDEF STRUCT

Hi Dan,

> typedef struct time newTime
>
> and then you use newTime instead of the struct time .
>
>
> WHY?
>
> Why is this better, etc..there must be problems with struct, right?

Yeah - it takes more letters to type.  That's the reason.  Compare:

   struct time t;

and

   newTime t;

Both do the same thing, but the latter saves typing 4 characters.

Time is money!!!!

Cheers,
Neil
-- 
http://www.njohnson.co.uk
_______________________________________________
Synth-diy mailing list
Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy