[sdiy] Wireless stuff
Needham, Alan
Alan.Needham at centrica.com
Wed Jan 19 17:35:00 CET 2011
| On 1/19/11 7:39 AM, "Karl Ekdahl" <elektrodwarf at yahoo.se> wrote:
|
| > Hi list. I was wondering if anyone's done wireless audio and how to
| cheaply
| > make it? It seems to me it shouldn't be very hard or expensive to do
| wireless
| > receivers / transmitters for audio - but i'm not really sure where
to
| start as
| > i've never dealt with this kinda stuff before. For simplicity's sake
if
| > transmitting audio it seems to me that sending and receiving analog
| signals
| > would be a hell of a lot easier then doing it digitally. Also, i'm
| wondering
| > how many separate channels one could do this on - the FM band seems
like
| a bad
| > idea since there's potential collisions with local radio... any
clues? I
| just
| > thought that the wireless receiver/transmitters out there seems
really
| bulky
| > for what they do and also very costly, i get a feeling one should be
| able to
| > DIY this for not that much money. Dreaming of never buying another
snake
| cable
| > ever again....
| >
| > Karl
| >
| Hi Karl,
|
| I am using STS 5.8 GHz radios for wireless multichannel speaker and
| wireless
| headphone apps.
|
| Regards,
|
| Terry
|
I guess the UK will be similar to USA for regulation (read OfCom for
FCC)
But we have a few license exempt frequencies, I use 2.4GHz to carry
video and stereo sound (nowhere near studio quality but ample for
short-hop CCTV).
Amateur radio licensing gives you a lot more freedom - many more bands
from a few hundred kHz to microwave, but your gear has to "accept
interference", if someone or something else jams you it's tough!
If you are a licensed amateur and a neighbour complains the authorities
can and DO investigate - I've seen it happen.
The encoding method (AM, FM, digital, ...) doesn't change anything but
cost and distortion mechanisms; you still need to consider either
getting a license or sticking to license-exempt frequencies and power
levels.
In short - commercial gear probably saves a ton of time and failed
experiments and gives you a solution that has known parameters - worth
the cost? Maybe!
Alan
_____________________________________________________________________
The information contained in or attached to this email is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are not authorised to and must not disclose, copy,distribute, or retain this message or any part of it. It may contain information which is confidential and/or covered by legal professional or other privilege (or other rules or laws with similar effect in jurisdictions outside England and Wales).
The views expressed in this email are not necessarily the views of Centrica plc, and the company, its directors, officers or employees make no representation or accept any liability for its accuracy or completeness unless expressly stated to the contrary.
A Centrica business British Gas Services Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority for its insurance mediation activities.
Registered office: Millstream, Maidenhead Road, Windsor, Berkshire SL4 5GD
Registered in England No 3141243.
Centrica plc
Registered office: Millstream, Maidenhead Road, Windsor, Berkshire SL4 5GD
Registered in England and Wales No 3033654
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list