[sdiy] vactrol transfer function
mark verbos
mverbos at earthlink.net
Sat Jan 1 01:19:38 CET 2011
On Dec 31, 2010, at 4:44 PM, David G. Dixon wrote:
>> I haven't analyzed it closely, but I don't think that a low pass would
>> quite get you there. With many Vactrols, the turn-on time is shorter than
>> the turn-off time. Maybe a slew with different rise and fall time
>> constants?
>
> Yes, I had a look at the Perkin Elmer vactrol application sheet (VT500)
> which Danjel van Tijn kindly sent me, and it's fairly obvious what the
> "special character" of the vactrol is. I think that a slew circuit with a
> couple of diodes and different resistors would do the job nicely.
>
> Here are the stated response times (on-time to 63% of final R_on, or
> off-time to 100k) for a collection of common vactrols:
>
> on-time off-time
> VTL5C1 2.5 ms 35 ms
> VTL5C2 3.5 ms 500 ms
> VTL5C3 2.5 ms 35 ms
> VTL5C4 6.0 ms 1.5 s
>
> Based on this, am I correct in assuming that the VTL5C2 is the most useful
> for synth purposes? Off-times for VTL5C1 and VTL5C3 seem kinda short, and
> the off-time for VTL5C4 seems kinda long.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Synth-diy mailing list
> Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
> http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
There is the added complication of "memory" in the photo cells. It is most noticeable when recording a Buchla into a DAW when you see that the first note is quieter than all the others. Of course, this is probably not a thing you WANT to emulate.
Mark
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list