[sdiy] Modeling circuits
Tom Wiltshire
tom at electricdruid.net
Sat Oct 23 15:31:31 CEST 2010
My bet;
A grudging "well, it's really pretty good..." with an unsurprising "...but it's still not quite as good as a genuine tube Bassman (insert favourite amp here)".
Of course, they won't be able to tell you in any concrete way *what* isn't as good.
Like you, I'm interested to see how it turns out.
T.
On 23 Oct 2010, at 13:37, Dave Kendall wrote:
> FWIW, the digidesign eleven rack http://www.avid.com/us/products/eleven-rack has different input impedances for whichever pedal or amp model is first in the chain. I believe 4 different impedances can be selected using digitally-controlled resistors. Sounds interesting - a guitarist friend has bought one, and 2 of his (purist tendency) friends are trying it out.
>
> Will be interested to see how it turns out.....
>
> cheers,
> Dave
>
> On Oct 23, 2010, at 09:35, cheater cheater wrote:
>
>> <semantics>
>> Scott, I think you're not actually talking about component level
>> modeling, just about "physical modeling" of circuits. or
>> component-based modeling, I.e. you take a circuit (or large block) and
>> find the (differential) equations that describe its behavior as a
>> whole and then you run that using newton-raphson or something like
>> that. I think component-level modeling would mean having separate
>> equations for every component, including separate sources of
>> self-noise, separate thermal characteristics, and possibly separate
>> device features as well (because of tolerances). I think this is what
>> Jason has touched upon in his email. Semantics, but I think it
>> explains :-)
>> </semantics>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> D.
>>
>> On 23/10/2010, Jason Proctor <jason at redfish.net> wrote:
>>> really? do you have a source for this information?
>>>
>>> i ask because of a post by Paul Schreiber a little while back which
>>> describes how component level modelling isn't viable with current
>>> processor technology.
>>>
>>> the interview with UAD in Tape Op also didn't mention this -- IIRC, that
>>> is...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> State of the art modeling such as Universal Audio uses, and probably
>>>> line6, actually painstakingly models the electrical behavior of
>>>> every circuit element (transistors resistors, tubes etc) on the
>>>> original circuit board and runs that model on one or more dsp chips,
>>>> which is why they need a lot of horsepower.
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 22, 2010, at 8:21 AM, "Barry Klein" <barryklein at cox.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> Just received an ad from Line6 on their "HD modeling" pedals.
>>>>> Made me wonder... What if you had one that took your crappy old
>>>>> sawtooth and made it
>>>>> a nice fat/phat Moog one.... you get the idea. Do these types of
>>>>> circuits apply different amounts
>>>>> and/or frequency eq based on the input character or are they fixed
>>>>> and you get what you get?
>>>>>
>>>>> Barry
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Synth-diy mailing list
>>>>> Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
>>>>> http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Synth-diy mailing list
>>>> Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
>>>> http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Synth-diy mailing list
>>> Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
>>> http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Synth-diy mailing list
>> Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
>> http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Synth-diy mailing list
> Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
> http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list