[sdiy] JOMOX
Thomas Strathmann
thomas at pdp7.org
Thu Oct 21 13:41:39 CEST 2010
On 10/21/10 10:50 , Gergo Palatinszky wrote:
> All the time when I see this kind of projects/synths I'm really wondering that we cannot develop an open HW+SW platform basically a synth motherboard where everybody can develop an own module ... digitally controlled switching/routing matrix for audio/control voltages ...several controller(encoder) which can be assigned to a module(for a time being to set and save parameters there) a bus system where 16-24-32-... independent module can be plugged in - can be changed easily (different modular config can be set very fastly)
> Each module have a digital part for controllers assignment and for storing control parameters ...
>
> At least it would be nice to start a specification round to see that this kind of community could be able to do it or not.... might comercial modular manufacturer can join to it ...
The main problem with specifications for very abstract and general
things is that people can and will go wild adding feature after feature
and not only does realizability suffer, but you also won't arrive at a
well-rounded design which could be interesting to manufacturers because
it is interesting to consumers.
Instead of just building a complete platform, I would rather collect
different circuits and idioms of building certain things like modulation
matrices, interfaces between digital control and analog sound
generation, etc. This should include mechanical details so a person with
reasonable skills and some free time on his hands could mix and match
the different parts to come up with a basic design suitable for the
synth of processor he wants to build. Kind of like the libraries for
VLSI design. This should be an attainable goal as it "only" requires
that people take the time to identify re-usable parts of their designs,
extract them, write a little in the way of documentation (a name, a few
words on what it does and maybe how if it's not easily deduced from the
schematics, and some hints on how to use it, again only if there are
some "special things" to consider), and publish them. But I guess this
is not the case for most (if not all) people here who could contribute
any meaningful bits, so this endeavour will probably never take off.
Thomas
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list