[sdiy] open letter to Aaron Lanterman

[Harry Bissell]

My point was that as a way of communicating information, YouTube is totally
failing me. A .pdf of a schematic, or a good .jpg photo gives me something
I can understand.  The movie clips would be nice as an addition to this.

Try watching the YouTube without sound and see how much you get from it...

I'm not putting down what has been done, only suggesting that so far I haven't
been able to follow it at all. I don't have audio at work and can't take the time
to sit through a movie... put I ~could~ print out a schematic and read it in the
cubicle that only has access to paper, if you catch my drift... :^)

Think of YouTube as an obnoxious website that makes the information you want
difficult or impossible to access.

I'm not saying it doesn't work, just that it doesn't work for me.

H^) harry


----- Original Message -----
From: Michael Zacherl. <sdiy-mz01 at blauwurf.info>
To: synth diy <synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl>
Sent: Fri, 07 May 2010 10:33:07 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: [sdiy] open letter to Aaron Lanterman


On May 7, 2010, at 15:41 , Paul Perry wrote:

> Another vote against youtube, as a repository.

maybe I'm mistaken, but I didn't understand Aaron's clips as documents in the classic sense or as a contribution to a repository rather than a way to give circuits and applications names and voices.
For demoing the sonic quality of the proposed circuits I'd rather prefer any decent audioformat (even high bitrate mp3s) over YouTube on-camera sound.
But I'm sure Aaron's pretty aware of all of this. ;-)

   m.

--
nonconform? noiseconform: http://blauwurf.at

_______________________________________________
Synth-diy mailing list
Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy

-- 
Harry Bissell & Nora Abdullah 4eva