[sdiy] Poor man's EMC testing?

[MTG]

And this coming from the kind of nonsense posts. I thought his quotes were 
interesting.

GB

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "cheater cheater" <cheater00 at gmail.com>
To: "Neil Johnson" <neil.johnson97 at ntlworld.com>
Cc: "synth diy" <synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl>
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 12:30 PM
Subject: Re: [sdiy] Poor man's EMC testing?


> Neil,
> the question was not directed at you, so you had no reason to answer
> it. If you want to mock people who are having an intelligent
> scientific conversation I suggest you do so elsewhere, although I
> can't think of one place that encourages your sort of behavior.
>
> D.
>
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 14:43, Neil Johnson <neil.johnson97 at ntlworld.com> 
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> cheater cheater wrote:
>>> What sort of difference in sensitivity and dynamic range are we
>>> talking about? What are the minimum values you'd recommend?
>>
>> http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=spectrum+analyzer+sensitivity
>>
>> In case your mouse is misfiring, some choice quotes:
>>
>> www.hameg.com: "Due to the superhet receiver principle, the logarithmic 
>> analysis and display of data, the spectrum analyser has a thousandfold 
>> higher sensitivity and a higher dynamic range (› 80dB) compared to an 
>> oscilloscope."
>>
>> www.tutorialsweb.com: "Normally, Oscilloscope can not measure very low 
>> voltage levels (say, -100dBm) and are intended for low frequency, high 
>> amplitude measurements. A spectrum analyzer can easily measure very low 
>> amplitudes (as low as -120dBm), and high frequencies (as high as 
>> 150GHz)."
>>
>> And so on...
>>
>> Neil
>> --
>> http://www.njohnson.co.uk
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Synth-diy mailing list
> Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
> http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>