[sdiy] Inverting Amplifier as a Buffer Output.
Oscar Salas
osaiber at yahoo.es
Wed Jun 23 23:38:33 CEST 2010
Thanks all for your replies.
I forgot to say that my question about these buffer outputs are within the context of a modular synthesizer. So we can expect 100K input impedances and 1K output impedance (A) or near 0 output impedance (B)
A question please scroll down:
--- On Wed, 6/23/10, Speth, John <John.Speth at coherent.com> wrote:
> From: Speth, John <John.Speth at coherent.com>
> Subject: Re: [sdiy] Inverting Amplifier as a Buffer Output.
> To: "synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl" <synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl>
> Date: Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 1:04 AM
> For both cases, the right-most
> resistor limits the current that the op-amp will supply when
> the next stage input resistance is low. Since case B's
> resistor is in the feedback loop, the voltage at the next
> stage input will track with the input with whatever scaling
> the other resistors provide. The downside is that it
> could drive the op-amp output out of compliance if the next
> stage input resistance is too low. There is no such
> regulation with case A.
>
> That's the tradeoff. It's up to you to assign value
> in terms of "advantage" or "disadvantage" based on your
> application.
>
> John Speth
> mailto:john.speth at coherent.com
In which way could the case B) drive the opamp out of compliance if there is low input impedance. What I should expect?
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: synth-diy-bounces at dropmix.xs4all.nl
> [mailto:synth-diy-
> > bounces at dropmix.xs4all.nl]
> On Behalf Of Oscar Salas
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 2:11 PM
> > To: synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
> > Subject: [sdiy] Inverting Amplifier as a Buffer
> Output.
> >
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I have drawn below two different configurations of an
> inverting
> > amplifier as buffer output:
> > A) The feedback resistor is taped -before- the output
> resistor.
> > B) The feedback resistor is taped -after- the output
> resistor.
> >
> > The case A) has voltage drop when it is conected to
> another module
> > input.
> > This is solved in the case B) where there is not
> voltage drop.
> > So, it seems a better solution.
> >
> > What advantages has the case A) versus the case B) if
> any?
> >
> >
> >
>
> ----/\/\/\/\-------
> >
> |
>
> |
> > A)
> |
>
> |
> >
> |
> = |
> >
> |
> = = |
> >
> -----------/\/\/\/\-------=
> -- = |
> >
>
> =
> =-----------/\/\/\/\
> >
>
> ----= + =
> >
> |
> = =
> >
> | =
> >
> __|__
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> ----/\/\/\/\----------------
> >
> |
>
> |
> > B)
> |
>
> |
> >
> |
> =
> |
> >
> |
> = =
> |
> >
> -----------/\/\/\/\-------=
> -- =
> |
> >
>
> =
> =---/\/\/\/\----------
> >
>
> ----= + =
> >
> |
> = =
> >
> | =
> >
> __|__
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Synth-diy mailing list
> > Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
> > http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>
> The information contained in this communication is
> confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended
> solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is
> addressed and others authorized to receive it. If you are
> not the intended recipient you are hereby (a) notified that
> any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action
> with respect to the content of this information is strictly
> prohibited and may be unlawful, and (b) kindly requested to
> inform the sender immediately and destroy any copies.
> Coherent is neither liable for the proper and complete
> transmission of the information contained in this
> communication nor for any delay in its receipt.
> _______________________________________________
> Synth-diy mailing list
> Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
> http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>
> --
> Harry Bissell & Nora Abdullah 4eva
> _______________________________________________
> Synth-diy mailing list
> Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
> http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list