[sdiy] Monosynth features poll

Tom Wiltshire tom at electricdruid.net
Tue Jan 26 14:52:11 CET 2010


I see. A bit of random gate bouncing adding a certain something to  
the leading edge of the envelope, I suppose.

There might be some delay issues too. I don't know, but I suspect  
that many uP-scanned keyboards don't respond that fast. The Prophet  
T8 (a top end instrument) scans its keyboard every millisecond, but  
only because it measures velocity. The 1980's wisdom seems to have  
been that anything under 20mS isn't perceptible and therefore doesn't  
matter. A simple gate direct from the keyboard is going to be faster  
to respond.

T.

On 26 Jan 2010, at 12:57, cheater cheater wrote:

> I like the direct access between the VCA and the
> resistance/scratchiness/debouncing of the leaf contacts. Without that
> it's like playing guitar in woolen mittens.
>
> D.
>
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 13:43, Tom Wiltshire  
> <tom at electricdruid.net> wrote:
>>
>> On 26 Jan 2010, at 11:42, cheater cheater wrote:
>>
>>> The most important feature of an 80s monosynth is the jwire  
>>> keyboard.
>>> Please no scanning circuits. Use scanning circuits for something  
>>> more
>>> appropriate like the buttons on your fridge.
>>
>> These aren't either/or, are they?
>> The Pro-One has both; a j-wire keyboard scanned by a uP.
>> Anyway, what's the problem with scanning circuits? It's a sensible  
>> enough
>> way to do it, and gives you flexibility about keyboard modes,  
>> arpeggiators,
>> etc.
>>
>> Now if you'd complained about rubber keyboard contacts, that's a  
>> different
>> story. Scanned or not, they're a pain.
>>
>> T.
>>
>>




More information about the Synth-diy mailing list