[sdiy] OT: The spin of electrons!

[karl dalen]

> String theory is just that, a theory. It combines the fun
> of abstract math with the fun of abstract physical models.
> Still they fail to completely model the hyperfine resonance
> of Hydrogen while the experimentalists have measured it into
> many more digits than the best theoretical number has been
> able to reach.

That sounds contradictoriness?

> >> The best you can say about an electron is that it
> is
> >> probably there and
> >> probably moving this fast.
> > 
> > I now read that magnetism are interaction
> > between charged particle/fields and photons? huh!?
> 
> Yes... photons are nice little particles...
> 
> >> Spin is a bookkeeping quantity. It has no real
> physical
> >> meaning, just like
> >> color for a quark.
> > 
> > Dark matter grayish? :)
> 
> Dont laugth at them. They tried hard to bring some colour
> into the field  after the dark ages. The last joke
> before that was Quantum Electro Dynamics (QED), but the
> joker in question got a price for it, so its OK I guess.
> Yeah, he got to play his bongo-drums on the TV. That Feynman
> bloke was in it for the laugths...
> 
> >> Even at absolute zero, an electron will still
> possess
> >> energy.
> > 
> > Witch brings up an old DIY question, does current flow
> at zero volts?
> 
> On average no, if you measured your volts properly.
> Eventually they will change the definition of an Ampere from
> a very constructed theoretical description into being based
> on the number of element charges passing a cross-section per
> second.

It was intended as a ironic joke! **current flows**, see? :)

Anyhow the whole Bohrian model apperas to be false, no lake of balls!

KD


      __________________________________________________________
Låna pengar utan säkerhet. Jämför vilkor online hos Kelkoo.
http://www.kelkoo.se/c-100390123-lan-utan-sakerhet.html?partnerId=96915014