[sdiy] pocket-sized DSO

[cheater cheater]

> If their big scopes with four channels and millions of
> samples per channel are equally slow, the memory stick feature would be
> comletely useless.

Hence you know what I mean :) The more expensive units have to be
fast. The cheap stuff is probably developed by work experience
students.

I think the more important question is.. what series is the scope
from? All units in the same series will be sharing the same guts, so
you might want to watch out there.

D.

On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 16:42, Ingo Debus <igg.debus at t-online.de> wrote:
>
> Am 20.02.2010 um 18:01 schrieb cheater cheater:
>
>> My car's wipers are missing a spot in the top center. Do all cars have
>> this issue too?
>>
>
> Is it a Toyota? ;-)
>
> Seriously: I'm not sure what you mean. Do you mean, it just cannot be done
> any better? I don't think this is the case. It's only a few very small files
> that are written to the memory stick, and this almost takes one minute. As I
> wrote, it's one of Tek's cheap scopes, with two channels and only 2500
> samples per channel. If their big scopes with four channels and millions of
> samples per channel are equally slow, the memory stick feature would be
> comletely useless.
>
> Ingo
>
>
>> D.
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 16:58, Ingo Debus <igg.debus at t-online.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 20.02.2010 um 04:49 schrieb Scott Nordlund:
>>>
>>>>  I sort of consider that DSOs, at least the ones I've used, don't really
>>>> get to be worthwhile until they're quite expensive
>>>
>>> We have a Tektronix DSO at work, one of the "cheaper" ones. It's really
>>> nice, except for one thing: it takes ages to write data on an USB memory
>>> stick. Do other DSOs have this issue too?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Synth-diy mailing list
> Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
> http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>