[sdiy] Oscilloscope question
Ian Fritz
ijfritz at comcast.net
Sun Feb 21 17:06:25 CET 2010
At 08:09 AM 2/21/2010, Justin Owen wrote:
>At 5 seconds I have a dot going across the screen as opposed to being able
>to see a complete waveform or line/measurement.
Yes, that's how they work. The dot is produced by a phosphor which dies
out in a short time. You used to be able to get special scopes with "long
persistance" phosphors, but I doubt you'll find one nowadays.
The usual analog solution is to photograph the trace with a long exposure
time. Many old scopes were set up to use with a polaroid camera, so you
could see the results fairly quickly. Except that it usually took several
tries to get the exposure right.
Your solution for today is to either get a digital storage scope, or to use
a digital camera to photograph the scope trace. For very slow traces you
might need a camera with a "bulb" exposure setting. It is hard to
synchronize the exposure to the trace, but you can make it work if you are
patient.
Ian
>Problem is, when measuring low frequencies (let's say 20Hz to LFO range)
>to view an entire cycle I need the Time/CM setting above 0.5 seconds -
>which makes it almost impossible to check the quality or shape or whatever
>of a waveform.
>
>Right now I'm working on a kick drum oscillator - and for those big long
>808 style Booooooms - that's a long old waveform - but it's almost
>impossible for me to see it in its entirety.
>
>So - if I wanted to look at a scope that could display an entire cycle or
>at least more info about lower frequency waveforms/signals but with the
>refresh rate of higher frequencies - what sort of specs should I be looking at?
>
>Maybe I should mention at this point that I only paid a tenner for my
>current scope. :)
>
>Thanks much.
>
>Justin
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Synth-diy mailing list
>Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
>http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list