[sdiy] scanned pots "jumping"

[cheater cheater]

Eric,
certainly :-) that was just for my holy law of one reply given to me
by the Big 8. If someone wants to talk to me about something bothering
them, I can argue my points just as well in private. There's no reason
to make a personal difference a public insult, but if someone welcomes
this, then I sometimes, not always, like to reply with the same >:->

D.

On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 00:44, Eric Brombaugh <ebrombaugh1 at cox.net> wrote:
> Damian,
>
> Let's de-escalate this a few notches please. No one is questioning your
> intelligence - it's obvious you've done a lot of reading. Please do
> likewise: Adam certainly doesn't need to be schooled on DSP considering his
> day job:
>
> http://www.audiodamage.com/
>
> I think the misunderstanding comes from some rather vaguely worded
> references in previous posts that didn't make it clear you were referring to
> digital filtering.
>
> Let's keep it friendly please.
>
> Eric
>
> On 02/03/2010 04:31 PM, cheater cheater wrote:
>>
>> Adam,
>>
>>> Care to cite some specific references to a few of these "hundreds" of
>>> books
>>> on the subject?
>>
>> here you go:
>>
>> http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=digital+signal+processing&x=0&y=0
>> each and every of those books contains an explanation of the one pole
>> rc filter, of a smoothing filter, or a one-pole digital filter
>> algorithm of some kind. Every single engineer to come out of school in
>> the last quarter decade knows what a low pass filter is, and I am not
>> only talking about electronic engineering and peripheral disciplines.
>>
>> Here is some more for your viewing pleasure:
>> http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=low+pass+filter+code
>>
>> And just so that you know you'll definitely get code:
>> http://www.google.com/codesearch?q=smoothing
>> http://www.google.com/codesearch?q=lowpass+filter
>>
>> So as you see, if you just try to search you find hundreds of
>> examples. And those are in no way difficult to find, just need to
>> think a little.
>>
>> I never said that everyone here is grossly ignorant on any subject.
>> However, if you feel attacked, then you probably have a reason to feel
>> so, but that's your own subconscious problem.
>>
>> Next time before you're calling someone out on knowledge, make sure
>> you're not taking them on an absolutely basic topic such as low pass
>> filtering. Are you going to call me out on being able to tie my shoes?
>> This sort of behavior makes you look quite stupid.
>>
>> John,
>> it's simple to join a mocker when you have no real arguments of your
>> own. If you have any specific things to say to me, you can always use
>> my email address. I felt compelled to give Adam information about some
>> books and such, but if we're supposed to talk there's no reason to
>> annoy the list members.
>>
>> D.
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 20:33, John Mahoney<jmahoney at gate.net>  wrote:
>>>
>>>> Care to cite some specific references to a few of these "hundreds" of
>>>> books
>>>> on the subject? Since everyone else on this list seems to be so grossly
>>>> ignorant about this topic, I'm sure we could all benefit by being given
>>>> a
>>>> couple of specific examples of the sources of your extensive knowledge.
>>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>>
>>>> --Adam
>>>
>>> I was curious as to the dictionary which defines "uncomplicated" as
>>> "having
>>> already been invented," as used below:
>>>
>>>> ... (and even core fusion is not that complicated anymore,
>>>> since it has been invented already).
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Synth-diy mailing list
>>> Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
>>> http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Synth-diy mailing list
>> Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
>> http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Synth-diy mailing list
> Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
> http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>