[sdiy] scanned pots "jumping"

[Eric Brombaugh]

Damian,

Let's de-escalate this a few notches please. No one is questioning your 
intelligence - it's obvious you've done a lot of reading. Please do 
likewise: Adam certainly doesn't need to be schooled on DSP considering 
his day job:

http://www.audiodamage.com/

I think the misunderstanding comes from some rather vaguely worded 
references in previous posts that didn't make it clear you were 
referring to digital filtering.

Let's keep it friendly please.

Eric

On 02/03/2010 04:31 PM, cheater cheater wrote:
> Adam,
>
>> Care to cite some specific references to a few of these "hundreds" of
>> books
>> on the subject?
>
> here you go:
> http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=digital+signal+processing&x=0&y=0
> each and every of those books contains an explanation of the one pole
> rc filter, of a smoothing filter, or a one-pole digital filter
> algorithm of some kind. Every single engineer to come out of school in
> the last quarter decade knows what a low pass filter is, and I am not
> only talking about electronic engineering and peripheral disciplines.
>
> Here is some more for your viewing pleasure:
> http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=low+pass+filter+code
>
> And just so that you know you'll definitely get code:
> http://www.google.com/codesearch?q=smoothing
> http://www.google.com/codesearch?q=lowpass+filter
>
> So as you see, if you just try to search you find hundreds of
> examples. And those are in no way difficult to find, just need to
> think a little.
>
> I never said that everyone here is grossly ignorant on any subject.
> However, if you feel attacked, then you probably have a reason to feel
> so, but that's your own subconscious problem.
>
> Next time before you're calling someone out on knowledge, make sure
> you're not taking them on an absolutely basic topic such as low pass
> filtering. Are you going to call me out on being able to tie my shoes?
> This sort of behavior makes you look quite stupid.
>
> John,
> it's simple to join a mocker when you have no real arguments of your
> own. If you have any specific things to say to me, you can always use
> my email address. I felt compelled to give Adam information about some
> books and such, but if we're supposed to talk there's no reason to
> annoy the list members.
>
> D.
>
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 20:33, John Mahoney<jmahoney at gate.net>  wrote:
>>
>>> Care to cite some specific references to a few of these "hundreds" of
>>> books
>>> on the subject? Since everyone else on this list seems to be so grossly
>>> ignorant about this topic, I'm sure we could all benefit by being given a
>>> couple of specific examples of the sources of your extensive knowledge.
>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>
>>> --Adam
>>
>> I was curious as to the dictionary which defines "uncomplicated" as "having
>> already been invented," as used below:
>>
>>> ... (and even core fusion is not that complicated anymore,
>>> since it has been invented already).
>>
>> John
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Synth-diy mailing list
>> Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
>> http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Synth-diy mailing list
> Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
> http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>