[sdiy] Contemplating DIP microcontrollers
Michael Zacherl.
sdiy-mz01 at blauwurf.info
Wed Dec 22 13:56:43 CET 2010
Hi,
a while ago I started to look at the Atmel XMEGA MCUs
(ATxmega384A1 ATxmega256A1 ATxmega192A1 ATxmega128A1 ATxmega64A1)
which seem quite promising to me.
The eval board looks nice:
http://ir.atmel.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=420715
http://www.atmel.com/products/AVR/xplain.asp?family_id=607
I also found a note that there's an Arduino port in the works:
http://www.arduino.cc/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1265563522/0
http://www.arduino.cc/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1269500888
The ADC/DACs are just 12-bit and the micro is not DSPpowered like the DSPics but the entire package and the Arduino environent looks quite tempting to me.
Michael. :-)
On Dec21, 2010, at 12:43 , John Luciani wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 5:01 AM, <lanterma at ece.gatech.edu> wrote:
>
>> If you add up the cost of, say, an ATMega328P and a MCP4922, you quickly exceed the cost of a dsPIC.
>> So the question is would there be any reason not to jump straight to using a dsPIC?
>
> One of the benefits of the ATmega ICs is the Arduino tools and the
> large community of
> developers. The tools are free and work on Linux, MAC, PC.
>
> Unfortunately a lot of uC's (especially the ones made by Atmel) do not
> include a DAC.
> Adding a DAC above 8 or 10 bits gets expensive in a DIP package. Using SMD will
> save quite a bit for higher resolution devices.
--
hear the colours of noise: http://blauwurf.at
http://soundcloud.com/noiseconformist
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list