[sdiy] Propeller CPU
Adam Schabtach
lists at studionebula.com
Mon Dec 20 18:37:48 CET 2010
FWIW, awhile back I looked at the literature on the Propeller (including
reading the programming reference) and arrived at the same conclusions as
Antti. At first glance it's interesting, but it's not clear that it offers
performance advantages over the ATmega family once you start using up its
cores ("cogs", rather) to do things that are handled by the hardware
peripherals in other MCUs.
Just my $0.02 worth, of course. If it really intrigues you, give it a try!
The proto boards aren't terribly expensive so you can play with one without
putting out much money.
--Adam
> I haven't used Propeller, but I did look into it about a year ago. My
> conclusion was that it's largely useless unless you need simple timing
> logic in a dip case. For simple mcu applications, avr and pic have it
> beat hands down. For number crunching, ARM7 is an order of magnitude
> faster (and can be had in a dip adapter). All three architectures
> allow using higher level language, such as C.
>
> Propeller would have been interesting if it had been out in, say,
> 1995. Today it's hopelessly outdated while lacking the cheap cost,
> simplicity and huge existing codebase of 8 bit mcus.
>
> Antti
>
> "No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow."
> -- Lt. Cmdr. Ivanova
> _______________________________________________
> Synth-diy mailing list
> Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
> http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list