[sdiy] WHICH PIC/UCONTROLLER should I buy today
Eric Brombaugh
ebrombaugh1 at cox.net
Sat Aug 14 03:09:25 CEST 2010
On 08/13/2010 05:18 PM, dan snazelle wrote:
> On Aug 13, 2010, at 7:19 PM, Eric Brombaugh wrote:
>> On 08/13/2010 03:54 PM, dan snazelle wrote:
>>> the FV-1 from spin is relatively easy and has good support, is the same true of the PIC/DSPIC community?
>>
>> Hmmm - you've found the FV-1 to be easy? In that case you should have no trouble with PIC/dsPIC. The MPLAB IDE that MCHP provides is much easier to use than the development tools that Spin provides and is much more of a professional tool.
>
> well when i say easy, I mean it hasnt been too hard to get some basic things going. the instruction set is quite small and there is a good forum for the chip.
Ah - that makes sense.
Don't try to read too much into the instruction set sizes of various
processors. The FV-1 chip has only a few instructions, but they're
extremely complex - each one does many things at once and learning how
to use them effectively can be challenging. The dsPIC has more
instructions, but they're simpler and easier to grasp.
FWIW - I converted some FV-1 code to dsPIC a while back and it takes
about 5X more instructions to do the same function in dsPIC. That may
translate into being able to do more operations in a sample period with
the FV-1, but the dsPIC provides you with a lot more I/O and memory
access than an FV-1 chip does. Pluses and minuses...
As far as support goes, there is also a fairly active forum for PIC &
dsPIC on the MCHP website, so do give those a look too. They're not as
geared towards audio applications, but they can be helpful.
Eric
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list