[sdiy] Re: OT Math rant, was Re: - DSP book recommendation wanted

[cheater cheater]

I'm sorry, I just feel like I'm somewhat in this capacity - perhaps
because I have been posting to sdiy for over, not under three months.
Well, tomorrow is your third month, so cheers to that!

Or maybe because I have made more than twenty posts..

Or maybe because it doesn't take a genius to tell that your personal
objections to something at all not related to synthesizers and/or
mathematics (which was the main topic of conversation) should be sent
off-list. And if it's a jab at a person, like displayed here, when you
don't know the guy's previous contributions to the list, then maybe
you should stop, drop, and cool down. I know the whole 'mailing list'
thing might be new, but that's how things usually work 'round these
parts.

(So that's for my 'one reply'. Not going to reply to your posts on
this topic on the list anymore, I'm afraid, but a pat on the back for
hitting both milestones I mentioned)

D.

On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 11:55 PM, aerogramma <aerogramma at gmail.com> wrote:
> I still find it peculiar to even bring it up, to say the least
>
> And I think I can take my political correctness wherever I want as you do
> with your views
>
> If you like to be the sole judge of what could be of interest or
> constructive to the list go and make one you can moderate yourself.
>
>
> On Sep 26, 2009, at 12:40 AM, cheater cheater wrote:
>
>> The point was that genetics are not related. Genetics are usually the
>> first thing people try to explain differences that happen only
>> locally, therefore this point needs to be reduced before it can be
>> brought up in the first place. Do you understand this, or is there
>> some other way I can say this, other than the three ways I have done
>> so already? Please take your septic political correctness to someone
>> else - thanks. If you have further objections that are not
>> constructive send them to me off-list.
>>
>> D.
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 11:25 PM, aerogramma <aerogramma at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I found it peculiar that someone could mention genetics to validate a
>>> theory
>>> on how well you learn math or not
>>>
>>> On Sep 25, 2009, at 11:54 PM, cheater cheater wrote:
>>>
>>>> nothing - that was exactly the point - what was yours?
>>>>
>>>> Or yours, Dave?
>>>>
>>>> D.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 1:45 PM, aerogramma <aerogramma at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> cheater cheater wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In Poland there are many good mathematicians. Nobody will argue that.
>>>>>> So are there in Russia. What's the difference you might ask. The
>>>>>> society isn't that different between Poland and the UK. I'd even say
>>>>>> that the UK allows you more time to study and do other related things
>>>>>> with ease, unlike Poland, where earnings are massively lower and
>>>>>> living expenses are almost the same. The genetics aren't that
>>>>>> different either. USA was set up by europeans. Same genes. The UK has
>>>>>> a lot of polish migrants, the east end of London has probably got more
>>>>>> polish genes floating around than of any other nationality.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> right... and what are genetics supposed to do with that,  if I may so
>>>>> ask?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> aero
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Synth-diy mailing list
>>>> Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
>>>> http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Synth-diy mailing list
>> Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
>> http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>
>