[sdiy] Eu might be banning Vactrols and LDRs??
cheater cheater
cheater00 at gmail.com
Thu Sep 10 11:34:04 CEST 2009
Can we please get back on the topic of LDRs please?
Thanks
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 12:58 AM, Bob Weigel<sounddoctorin at imt.net> wrote:
> Hehe. And yeah exactly Barry. Straining out gnats, swallowing camels.
> That's what it's all about for this generation it seems.
>
> We have access to SO MUCH intelligence! What will people's excuse be on
> judgment day I wonder :-)
>
> Anyway I recently did an updated calculation on wind power. 10 grad for
> 2.5kw max output. EVEN IF the thing got half that or so average..which it
> usually won't of course...and NEVER broke down..you'd be still barely paying
> interest at 6% with the electricity you save.
>
> So with so many really productive things governments like our own could be
> pointing at...why are they pointing at things like this?
>
> I believe there is a group (as documented in "End Game" by indisputable
> video evidence) that is meeting secretly with foreign officials. That's
> illegal in the US. Our government isn't supposed to be doing that. So WHY
> would our officials break the law and put themselves at risk like this?
>
> Because obviously they are trying to construct a world government. And part
> of the process of that is bring all nations to such horrible inefficiency
> that they cry out for 'change'.... And due to the way people respond in
> general to social pressure there is a huge infrastructure of fear-filled
> little sheeple who carry along some of this absurd agenda and cram it
> through. It's really remarkable.
>
> Anyway it would sure make it a lot nicer for people who want to do
> productive things if there were some reasonable group of scientists that
> couldn't be gotten to by bribes, threats, etc. who OK'd ALL this kind of BS
> legislation including writing a full blown research paper on their findings.
>
> How could that be done in a way that would ellude corruption? hmmm. Well if
> the thought were taken seriously I'd figure out a way :-)
>
> Barry Klein wrote:
>
>> You guys want to learn of another stupid one, Google "EUP lot 6".
>> This is a similar decree to have 1W standby power on things without a
>> display, 2W with a display.
>> With the inefficiencies of wallwarts and then regulators down the
>> foodchain, it gets pretty rediculous.
>> Adds unnecessary cost to a product and hurts its usability and feature
>> set.
>> Also it is so poorly officiated that we get zero response when we want
>> clarifications.
>> Big business is going with it - like the router guys, computer guys, tv
>> guys, etc.
>> This would be fine for things that waste power otherwise, but now we are
>> just adding more crap to toss in the junk
>> heap due to forced obsolesense and short product lifetimes....
>> And I don't know who the ROHAS/EUP etc. cops are....
>> I wish someone would blatently fight this stuff.
>> Apologies to those environmentalists here - I just think your agendas
>> would be better targeted on things that all agree are beneficial and have
>> less negative impact. Say like putting a solar panel setup on my roof....
>>
>> Barry
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Synth-diy mailing list
>> Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
>> http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Synth-diy mailing list
> Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
> http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list