[sdiy] midi to arpeggio clock

[Neil Johnson]

Hi,

On 3 May 2009, at 17:45, Jason Proctor wrote:
>> Oh, I don't think its _that_ bad.  If you take the spec as it is,  
>> rather than assume that it has wider scope, then its not a bad  
>> spec as such.  And at only 58 pages (+ appendices and tables) its  
>> not a large spec by any means.
>
> how does the panel feel about the note on with velocity zero being  
> interpreted as a note off? i always expressly disliked that one.

A good idea, if a little hacky, but it does mean that, absent  
controllers that generate note off velocity, running status can  
support a stream of note-on (with velocity) and note-off messages.

Cheers,
Neil
--
http://www.njohnson.co.uk