[sdiy] SRAM versus DRAM

[John Luciani]

On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Dan Snazelle<subjectivity at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> i know a lot of digital delays use the 2164 DRAM (peavey, electro harmonix and MXR digital delay)
> which is why before I saw the polyphony digital delay project which calls for SRAM (4k x 1 bit, 8 of them) I had thought DRAM was the way to go in a digital delay.

How old is the Polyphony article? I would use a uC that has a DRAM
controller and then
the refresh issue is solved. It also gets you control of ADCs and DACs.

Using SRAM is probably going to be very expensive.

(* jcl *)


-- 

You can't create open hardware with closed EDA tools.

http://www.luciani.org