[sdiy] Proposed DSP board

Eric Brombaugh ebrombaugh1 at cox.net
Wed Jan 21 22:09:40 CET 2009


Tim Ressel wrote:
> Tom,
> 
> I am currently struggling with the codec issue. One possibility is the AD1998. The AD1988 had 6 in/10 out with one interface, but I need to go over it and see if I can bypass all the surround sound stuff. 
> 
> As far as the processor goes, you raise a good point. I picked AVR for the good reason of I know it have have used it many times. If I use a non-AVR then I'll be learning 2 new procs. Not sure I want to do that. But as you pointer out, my choice may lead to others having to learn 2 new procs. 
> 
> What to do? I could leave the co-proc off and let developers attach their fav uP to it. Or if there was just 1 other proc choice I could put both on the board. But that sounds messy and wasteful. 
> 
> What you you think?

Perhaps consider the MCHP PIC24F family. There are parts there which 
have built-in USB (with OTG capability!) and the core processor 
architecture is identical to the dsPIC (sans DSP stuff). Then you'd only 
be learning 1 new processor architecture and the development environment 
would be the same for both parts.

For example:

http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?Detail&name=PIC24FJ64GB106-I/PT-ND

Eric



More information about the Synth-diy mailing list