[sdiy] Triangle wave DCOs?

[Tom Wiltshire]

I don't understand how you're going to get any asymmetry if it's  
being switched by a microprocessor. The one thing you can be damn  
sure of is that the time going up and the time going down are the  
same. Assuming you don't change the current, that'll guarantee the  
symmetry, won't it? The amplitude compensation is still a problem,  
but that's the same for ramp DCOs, and isn't that hard to solve.

Still, like Aaron, I can't see any particular advantage over a ramp- 
reset DCO.

T.

On 17 Jan 2009, at 18:09, harrybissell at wowway.com wrote:

> sounds tricky. errors in the ramp would be in amplitude in one
> direction... the triangle could clip at either rail... Asymmetry in
> a triangle would be MUCH more obvious than a sawtooth
>
> H^) harry
>
>
>
> On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 23:07:35 -0500, Aaron Lanterman wrote
>> I was reading through some of the traffic on DCOs (typified by ramp-
>> with-microprocessor-controlled-reset type sawtooth cores), and was
>> wondering... anyone know of any similar designs for triangle cores,
>> where say a microprocessor is responsible for deciding when to
>> switch  the direction of the current going into the integrator?
>> Basically,  something like a Buchla VCO, but with a microprocessor
>> decided when to  trip the switch instead of a comparator.
>>
>> I can't think of any particular advantage of such a scheme over a
>> ramp- with-reset, but there might be something I'm overlooking.
>>
>> - Aaron
>> _______________________________________________
>> Synth-diy mailing list
>> Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
>> http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>
>
> Harry Bissell & Nora Abdullah 4eva
>
> _______________________________________________
> Synth-diy mailing list
> Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
> http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>