[sdiy] Wikipedia DCO article

[Bob Weigel]

Oh I see what you mean.  Yea I was thinking of the latter synths there 
and I did gramatically group them.  I was thinking people probably 
associated a *type* of synth with 'Juno' and I was noting how this new 
series appeared the same year and THESE had the cpu driven 
waveforms...I'll make it more clear.  The MKS30 and JX3P are timer as I 
recall along with the SX Kawai's, the Bit series and..maybe the poly61 
too...can't recall. 

Cornutt, David K wrote:

>Nice work, Tom.  One thing: The second-to-last paragraph
>of the "Historical" section implies that the Juno-106 uses
>the high-frequency pulse shaping method.  In fact, all of 
>Juno-6, 60, and 106 use the same DCO design -- a ramp core
>with reset pulses from a digital counter, controlled by the
>microprocessor.  I'm a bit sensitive to this because I keep
>seeing people claim that the 106 is vastly different in
>design from the 60, and it really isn't.  
>
>_______________________________________________
>Synth-diy mailing list
>Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
>http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>
>
>  
>