[sdiy] Wikipedia DCO article

[Bob Weigel]

I probably left something that could be read that way.  I didn't go into 
detail on the JUNO's and I'll try to fix it if it's in the section I 
wrote...  otherwise I'll leave it for Tom.  But the main difference in 
60 and 106 I think is analog envelopes on the early junos and probably 
just a little different set up on the filters though they really are 
using the same parts inside those modules. -Bob

Cornutt, David K wrote:

>Nice work, Tom.  One thing: The second-to-last paragraph
>of the "Historical" section implies that the Juno-106 uses
>the high-frequency pulse shaping method.  In fact, all of 
>Juno-6, 60, and 106 use the same DCO design -- a ramp core
>with reset pulses from a digital counter, controlled by the
>microprocessor.  I'm a bit sensitive to this because I keep
>seeing people claim that the 106 is vastly different in
>design from the 60, and it really isn't.  
>
>_______________________________________________
>Synth-diy mailing list
>Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
>http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>
>
>  
>