[sdiy] Re: Swapping copper layers in Eagle
Matthew Smith
matt at smiffytech.com
Wed Jan 7 23:26:17 CET 2009
Quoth Ian Fritz at 2009-01-08 00:44...
> Ditto. I'm totally amazed that people keep struggling with that ... that
> ... Oh well.
OK, some people like Eagle. For those who are indifferent to it or
don't like it, there may well be reasons to keep on with it:
1) Skills investment - do not want/can not afford the resources involved
in re-education of self or staff with a different product.
2) Investment in licenses.
3) Investment in part libraries.
I purchased the minimum non-for-profit license about 18 months ago to
gain extra board area (although it doesn't look much bigger.) I was
supposed to get a printed manual but, despite a couple of chasing
e-mails, have had nothing but excuses.
As regards part libraries, I find creating parts the most time-consuming
and unpleasant of tasks in the design process; the worst part of this is
the painstaking process of creating packages. (I reckon that only about
0.0000000000000000001% of SMD packages in use are in the standard Eagle
libraries. OK, maybe that's a bit of an exaggeration but...) The fact
that there are libraries - both from Cadsoft and contributed - for so
many parts has always been a point in Eagle's favour. I find it hard to
face the idea of having to re-create all my components.
There is, of course, a major 'con' as regards contributed
libraries/parts: I have heard horror-stories about Eagle files that are
created on 'cracked' versions of Eagle than will completely trash any
legal/licensed installation if loaded.
Eagle's other 'pro' point for me is the fact that there is a Linux
version so I don't have to face the tiresome issue of having to fire up
a Windoze XP session under VMWare, slowing down everything else I am
doing on the machine.
If I were to change, I'd be moving to a free/libre OSS solution which
would have to be as well or better featured as Eagle. There would also
need to be a user-contributed devices repository available as I have
neither the time nor the inclination to create all the devices/packages
that I use from scratch.
If anyone can point me at such a wonder, I am certainly willing to be
persuaded.
Cheers
M
--
Matthew Smith
Smiffytech - Technology Consulting & Web Application Development
Business: http://www.smiffytech.com/
Personal: http://www.smiffysplace.com/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/smiffy
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list