[sdiy] Walsh bank, was: Re: [sdiy] Micro as a Linear to Exponential converter?
Scott Nordlund
gsn10 at hotmail.com
Sun Aug 16 17:46:32 CEST 2009
> And both Fourier and Walsh synthesis have the same control problem -
> how do you easily shape the dynamic evolution of many harmonics/
> functions over time? After all, I don't want to spend my *whole* life
> setting up envelope generator parameters...
I'm not sure if you can easily get smooth transitions between
waveforms by just interpolating the Walsh coefficients either. For
high resolution Walsh synthesis, I would expect the territory
immediately between sin(1*f*t) and sin(2*f*t) would be a buzzy mess,
right? So if you wanted to take a "timbre frame" approach, you'd
have to do the interpolation of the Fourier domain and then do the
complete transform to get the Walsh coefficients. But you could
simply interpolate the PCM (or pulse amplitude modulation, or
whatever) to get the desired effect.
> Don't get me wrong - I'd love it if Walsh provided an easy, efficient
> way to generate arbitrary waves, but I don't see it yet.
I don't see any advantages versus directly generating the signal. As
far as manual coefficient twiddling is concerned, especially. Maybe,
given sufficient work, it has something to offer, but I'd take the
fact that it hasn't really been used a lot as a bit of a hint.
_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live: Make it easier for your friends to see what you’re up to on Facebook.
http://windowslive.com/Campaign/SocialNetworking?ocid=PID23285::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:SI_SB_facebook:082009
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list