[sdiy] Music Easel ring mod analysis
Paul Perry
pfperry at melbpc.org.au
Tue Sep 23 05:24:28 CEST 2008
Well maybe - I use an AD633 myself - but when a person is making a MUSICAL
instrument, it may well be that the "non ideal" characteristics of the
components & circuit responses are a part of the whole deal.
I've never heard anyone complain about any of Buchla's gear.
I'm not a "magic mojo capacitor" kind of guy, but I think the Buchla stuff
is designed with the idea of being a musical instrument, not a piece of lab
gear.
paul perry Melbourne Australia
-----Original Message-----
On Nov 22, 2008, at 2:12 PM, Grant Richter wrote:
> A few days fooling on the breadboard and some fast Audiohm
> optoisolators and you could come up with a FAR superior circuit.
Oh, very true... but I'm doing this more out of historical curiosity
(particularly my Easel obsession), and also just to understand what
the giants I'm standing on the shoulders of have done (need to figure
out the state of the art before improving on the art), not to create
the perfect ring mod. After all, you could forgo the optoisolators and
just use an AD633 and be done - and I suspect that's what Buchla would
do if he were making a modern Easel.
- Aaron
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list