[sdiy] S&H

Analog-Monster carsten at analog-monster.de
Fri Sep 12 09:04:41 CEST 2008


Yeah, that's why I used 10µs, see also

http://www.analog-monster.de/suh_en.html

Regards

Carsten

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jay Schwichtenberg" <jays at aracnet.com>
To: "Synth DIY" <synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl>
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 6:24 AM
Subject: RE: [sdiy] S&H


> Mark,
>
> To me it sounds like the sample gate (period of time that the sample 
> switch
> is letting signal through) is too long. That would allow the signal to
> change while it's being sampled.
>
> Jay S.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: synth-diy-bounces at dropmix.xs4all.nl
> [mailto:synth-diy-bounces at dropmix.xs4all.nl]On Behalf Of mark verbos
> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 6:31 PM
> To: Synth DIY
> Subject: [sdiy] S&H
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
> What is a normal acquisition time/cap size for an LF398 sample and
> hold? I built a Buchla 266's sample and hold and I find that the
> 10ms/.18uF combination is giving a pop at the transistions if I have
> a fast moving input signal. Seems like that big of a cap is nice to
> hold for a long time, but it needs a long time to charge up. I'm not
> sure if that's normal for this module.
>
> thoughts?
>
>
> Mark
> _______________________________________________
> Synth-diy mailing list
> Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
> http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Synth-diy mailing list
> Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
> http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
> 





More information about the Synth-diy mailing list