[sdiy] Schematic/PCB layout best practices
Aaron Lanterman
lanterma at ece.gatech.edu
Sat Oct 4 04:40:22 CEST 2008
Greeting schematicians and PCBeings,
1) Is there a Best Practice for numbering components? I'm putting in
schematics into Eagles in a semirandom fashion, and am hence getting
them numbered in a semirandom fashion.
I was thinking:
A) It might be best to renumber them based on how they appear on the
final PCB, maybe number with increasing numbers left to right or
something, to make things easier to find there, or
B) It might be best to number based on the schematic, where say parts
near one another in the circuit have similar numbers; or maybe if
there are multiple similar subcircuits, or...
C) Number based on the schematic, but instead have the equivalent
parts in the different subcircuits have similar numbers (i.e. input
resistors R1 through R5, feedback resistors R6 through R10, resistors
to ground R11 or R25), or
C) I'm totally overthinking this and should let randomness rule.
2) What's the Best Practice for choice of trace width for (A) typical
signals and (B) power and ground for typical synth module operation? I
realize I've been using Eagle's default, which is 0.016 for default,
for signals, and 0.024 for ground and power since it was the next step
bigger from 0.016 from the drop down menu, but then I figured I should
have better reasons for picking values than they happen to be some
Eagle defaults.
3) Buchla quite often has separate "Quiet" and "Noisy" grounds. He
uses the Noisy grounds in digital circuitry, but he also seems to use
the noisy grounds sometimes in circuitry related to control signals,
in places where it seems hooking things to a "Quiet" grounds would do
no harm. If a circuit I'm working on is pretty much all analog, is the
a compelling reason to keep separate "signal" and "control" grounds,
or can I just lump them all together? Is it related to Buchla using
1/8" for signal but bananas for control?
- Aaron
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list