[sdiy] VCO design question
karl dalen
dalenkarl at yahoo.se
Thu Oct 2 21:52:01 CEST 2008
>Not even when you have sample rates in excess of 1Mhz and bit depths
>in excess of 32bit.
Really? And that coming from the most wavetabled person on the net!........ :-)
KD
--- Den ons 2008-12-03 skrev Paul Maddox <paul.maddox.mail-list at synth.net>:
> Från: Paul Maddox <paul.maddox.mail-list at synth.net>
> Ämne: Re: [sdiy] VCO design question
> Till: "Antti Huovilainen" <ajhuovil at cc.hut.fi>
> Kopia: "synth DIY" <synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl>
> Datum: onsdag 3 december 2008 00.57
> Antti,
>
>
> > For a valid comparison it has to have same quality and
> features as the analog solution though. Apples to apples and
> all that.
>
> In which case no digital system will ever be adequate.
> The same is true for DSP based synthesis, I mean, is
> 44.1Khz good enough? is 96Khz? 24 or 16 bit? if you're
> gong to use digital the line has to be somewhere.
> as you say yourself, apples and oranges.
>
> Each person draws the line as to what they consider
> 'adequate' quality in terms of features.
> Life is a compromise, audio the same. :-)
>
> > Digital oscillator can do that, but it's no longer
> quite trivial.
>
> sorry, if you're insistent on 'analogue'
> quality you will never achieve that with Digital. Not even
> when you have sample rates in excess of 1Mhz and bit depths
> in excess of 32bit.
>
> Paul
> _______________________________________________
> Synth-diy mailing list
> Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
> http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
___________________________________________________
Sök efter kärleken!
Hitta din tvillingsjäl på Yahoo! Dejting: http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;185753627;24584539;x?http://se.meetic.yahoo.net/index.php?mtcmk=148783
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list