Re: [sdiy] W3C?

rdrake rdrake at data2action.com
Sat Oct 25 03:39:12 CEST 2008


would you please take this off-topic embarassing display of your arrogance and ignorance someplace else?  i keep hitting the delete key, but you just won't go away.  STFU already.

>----- ------- Original Message ------- -----
>From: sounddoctorin at imt.net
>To: samppa.tolvanen at gmail.com
>Sent: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:20:21
>
>    For-profit organization that has annual gross
>revenue, as measured 
>by the most recent audited statement, of greater
>than or equal to 
>50,000,000 USD.	 68,500 USD
>All other organizations, including not-profit
>organizations and 
>government agencies.	 7,900 USD
>
>
>
>There are the fees for US people joining this
>wonderful...W3C service?  
>AHem.... Those are yearly dues I believe?  At first
>I was trying to 
>figure out it if was $7.90 thinking "That's..pretty
>steep considering 
>they aren't doing really...anything for me that I
>can figure out 
>yet...."  Not to mention it's littered with
>globalist mindset lingo.
>
>FYI some of us crazy yanks still believe that it's
>best government be 
>kept to a more local level.  So that there can be
>CONTRAST in the world. 
>And people can MIGRATE from oppressive cultures to
>ones that are free if 
>they so choose to undertake the journey.  Sadly the
>globalists are 
>trying to sell America into being just another pawn
>in their 
>manipulation web.   Some of us still OWN everything
>we have humble 
>though it may be, rather than going in to bad debt
>etc.	Some of us 
>HELP those in need directly instead of whining for
>the government to do it.
>
>Ok back to DIY stuff?	Again I really appreciate
>the good advice given 
>and am in process putting some of those things to
>work.	PLEASE DIRECT 
>ALL FURTHER COMMUNICATION ON THIS DIRECTLY TO ME
>since we've probably 
>well saturated the useful aspects of the topic
>here.	 Samppa...direct 
>all your further communication for me to dev/null
>as always.  Thanks.  -Bob
>
>Bob Weigel wrote:
>
>> PS I didn't even know what W3C was.	Apparently
>some group attempting 
>> to establish international 'standards'?
>>
>> If you're in tight with these people maybe you
>can shop my idea of 
>> having a code that marks the beginning and end of
>a section of html so 
>> that crawlers can tell what they should and
>should NOT associate, so 
>> as to avoid the noted types of bogus 'hits'.  Do
>they have something 
>> like that already in place?	 Provide link if so
>and I'll immediately 
>> employ it where I can on my site.   -Bob
>>
>> Samppa Tolvanen wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I want Florian, Ranier and Johannes banned from
>the list. It is
>>> politically correct.They didn't contribute any
>constructive = positive
>>> feedback. They are evil! Bad people!
>>>
>>> I googled for  the "sounddoctorin" and I was
>praised! Hallelujah!! - I
>>> must PRAY for those keys - My Father will fix my
>keyboard.. and I will
>>> thank HIM!!
>>>
>>> Samppa
>>>
>>> p.s. Gettin' site to validate on W3C is a good
>start.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Synth-diy mailing list
>>> Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
>>>
>http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>
>>>
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Synth-diy mailing list
>> Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
>>
>http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>
>>
>>
>_______________________________________________
>Synth-diy mailing list
>Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
>http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy



More information about the Synth-diy mailing list