Re: [sdiy] W3C?
rdrake
rdrake at data2action.com
Sat Oct 25 03:39:12 CEST 2008
would you please take this off-topic embarassing display of your arrogance and ignorance someplace else? i keep hitting the delete key, but you just won't go away. STFU already.
>----- ------- Original Message ------- -----
>From: sounddoctorin at imt.net
>To: samppa.tolvanen at gmail.com
>Sent: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:20:21
>
> For-profit organization that has annual gross
>revenue, as measured
>by the most recent audited statement, of greater
>than or equal to
>50,000,000 USD. 68,500 USD
>All other organizations, including not-profit
>organizations and
>government agencies. 7,900 USD
>
>
>
>There are the fees for US people joining this
>wonderful...W3C service?
>AHem.... Those are yearly dues I believe? At first
>I was trying to
>figure out it if was $7.90 thinking "That's..pretty
>steep considering
>they aren't doing really...anything for me that I
>can figure out
>yet...." Not to mention it's littered with
>globalist mindset lingo.
>
>FYI some of us crazy yanks still believe that it's
>best government be
>kept to a more local level. So that there can be
>CONTRAST in the world.
>And people can MIGRATE from oppressive cultures to
>ones that are free if
>they so choose to undertake the journey. Sadly the
>globalists are
>trying to sell America into being just another pawn
>in their
>manipulation web. Some of us still OWN everything
>we have humble
>though it may be, rather than going in to bad debt
>etc. Some of us
>HELP those in need directly instead of whining for
>the government to do it.
>
>Ok back to DIY stuff? Again I really appreciate
>the good advice given
>and am in process putting some of those things to
>work. PLEASE DIRECT
>ALL FURTHER COMMUNICATION ON THIS DIRECTLY TO ME
>since we've probably
>well saturated the useful aspects of the topic
>here. Samppa...direct
>all your further communication for me to dev/null
>as always. Thanks. -Bob
>
>Bob Weigel wrote:
>
>> PS I didn't even know what W3C was. Apparently
>some group attempting
>> to establish international 'standards'?
>>
>> If you're in tight with these people maybe you
>can shop my idea of
>> having a code that marks the beginning and end of
>a section of html so
>> that crawlers can tell what they should and
>should NOT associate, so
>> as to avoid the noted types of bogus 'hits'. Do
>they have something
>> like that already in place? Provide link if so
>and I'll immediately
>> employ it where I can on my site. -Bob
>>
>> Samppa Tolvanen wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I want Florian, Ranier and Johannes banned from
>the list. It is
>>> politically correct.They didn't contribute any
>constructive = positive
>>> feedback. They are evil! Bad people!
>>>
>>> I googled for the "sounddoctorin" and I was
>praised! Hallelujah!! - I
>>> must PRAY for those keys - My Father will fix my
>keyboard.. and I will
>>> thank HIM!!
>>>
>>> Samppa
>>>
>>> p.s. Gettin' site to validate on W3C is a good
>start.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Synth-diy mailing list
>>> Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
>>>
>http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Synth-diy mailing list
>> Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
>>
>http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>
>>
>>
>_______________________________________________
>Synth-diy mailing list
>Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
>http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list