[sdiy] Sampler mode...

[Andre Majorel]

On 2008-11-18 22:39 +0000, Seb Francis wrote:
> ASSI wrote:

> An alternative is to analyse the sample as it's being recorded,
> and  store a table of zero-crossing points.  If one uses a
> control resolution  of 1024 points with 3 bytes needed to store
> each address, then that's  3KB of RAM needed and the dsPIC in
> question has 16KB.

Yes, that's what I would try first.

>> Then there's the insignificant problem of what should happen
>> when you  change the loop point while you are actually doing
>> the splice...
>
> Well you would just keep the old loop point until it's not 'in
> use' any  more.  But I really think the x-fade splice is not
> going to be the best  way to do it anyway.

Agreed.

-- 
André Majorel <URL:http://www.teaser.fr/~amajorel/>