[sdiy] Compensating PTC and NTC resistors
René Schmitz
uzs159 at uni-bonn.de
Wed Mar 26 01:19:38 CET 2008
Barry Klein schrieb:
> Just saw this. Maybe it puts more wood to the fire of the ongoing
> "discussion"....
Well, I this thought had actually crossed my mind as well, but as with
such things I didn't persue that.
Like neural networks, genetic algorithms are suited to a wide variety of
optimisation problems. But shooting them at a problem in 3 or 4
variables, seemed a bit overkill to me. The higher the dimension of your
search space gets the more you are benefiting (or even haveing to resort
to) such algorithms.
(My first real contact with GAs was a 2D-Image recognition technique
where hand gestures would be recognized, I think the hand model had 18
or 19 variables, luckily I did just have to do a seminar paper, and not
implement it.)
Here the problem has 6 variables, and might already be at the point
where you get a benefit. If you have to often design such networks.
But then you can as well write a program that (basically *) brute
forcely tests all possible combinations of E96 values, and delivers its
possible candidates also within seconds. No trouble with convergence at
all, and you'll really find an optimum solution...
* Well you'd make some guesses on the ranges, to speed it up a little...
Or use a binary search strategy in to narrow down possible candidate
ranges, which you then search exhaustively. Makeing use of steadiness of
the functions involved.
Cheers,
René
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list