[sdiy] Pot-based SVFs
Jim Patchell
patchell at cox.net
Thu Mar 13 13:51:51 CET 2008
That schematic is incorrect. The loop for controlling the Q should
return back to the + terminal just like you said. Most likely just a
little slipp up....
-Jim
Aaron Lanterman wrote:
> Tomorrow's lecture is on State Variable filters.
>
> I have examples to show from the Oberheim SEM and the EML-101, which I
> understand fairly well.
>
> I'd also like to show a couple of real-world examples of
> non-voltage-controlled SVFs - i.e. ones controlled with regular pots -
> before I dig into the voltage-controlled ones. I'm looking for something
> with a real-world world schematics, i.e. not idealized textbook
> schematics. Any ideas?
>
> I ran across this design by M. Danielson:
>
> http://home.swipnet.se/cfmd/synths/schematics/svf1.pdf
>
> But something doesn't look right to me. Both feedback loops should be
> negative, if I understand the universe right; going through two
> integrators and then into the - input of the op amp maps sense to me,
> but taking the output of the first integrator and running it to the
> negative doesn't, since that looks like positive feedback. I think it
> should be going to the positive terminal of the first op amp.
>
> The initial input is going into the negative terminal, but that's
> incidental.
>
> Is there something I'm missing?
>
> - Aaron
> _______________________________________________
> Synth-diy mailing list
> Synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
> http://dropmix.xs4all.nl/mailman/listinfo/synth-diy
>
>
--
----------------------------------------------
Visit http://www.noniandjim.com
SDIY: http://www.noniandjim.com/Jim/index.html
----------------------------------------------
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list