[sdiy] 1496 VCA?
Dave Manley
dlmanley at sonic.net
Fri Jun 13 22:15:06 CEST 2008
John Mahoney wrote:
> Ian Fritz wrote:
>> The 1495/6 approach was almost instantly dropped when OTAs became
>> available. They require quite a few external parts, they have to be
>> carefully trimmed, and unless you hand pick selected units they typically
>> don't null out very well.
>
> To "not null out" means to allow CV feedthrough, is that right?
I think here, "null out" means to set 0 gain for 0 CV.
Also there is the issue that a balanced modulator is a 4-quadrant
multiplier, while a VCA is a 2-quadrant multiplier. This means if the
CV is negative, the 4-quadrant multiplier inverts the input signal, and
so requires an additional circuit to prevent output when the CV is
negative (IC1+diode form a rectifier clamping negative CV to 0). VCAs
don't have this problem.
-Dave
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list