[sdiy] CA3046 vs. SSM2210
pata at ieee.org
pata at ieee.org
Sat Jan 26 02:57:49 CET 2008
Hi Kyle and the Lists!
CA3046
Status: Discontinued (DIP package).
Consists of 5 NPN TR's but 1 matched-pair.
Reasonable price ($0.5 or less)
Caution: Lots of FAKE are seen in market.
SSM2210
Status:Active
Consists of 2 NPN TR's as 1 matched-pair.
Lower noise, closed matching.
I recommend SSM2210 rather than CA3046 if you want to get better
characteristics, but we know CA3046 (or even CA3086) is good enough in
all circuits in analog synthesizers.
So, you can choose as you like.
Kyle Stephens wrote:
> Ahoy...
>
> I'm in the final stages of bulding my MFOS Soundlab.
>
> Ray (somewhat warily?) recomends using the CA3046s for
> matched transistors in the VCOs, but I've seen the
> SSM22210 used elsewhere for the same purpose and at a
> glace the datasheet sounds more impressive in any
> case.
>
> Is there any worthwhile difference? Anything better
> than either of them?
>
--
===================================================
KATAYAMA, Takuya
Muse Music Synthesizer Laboratory
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list