[sdiy] Harmonic bandwidth
Peter Keller
psilord at cs.wisc.edu
Mon Jan 7 22:19:58 CET 2008
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 10:08:33AM -0800, Ben Lincoln wrote:
> Yes, sorry, I should have phrased what I wrote in a better way. I agree
> that the main part of his approach is to replace pure harmonics with
> clusters of closely-spaced (frequency-wise) sine waves. What I meant was
> that since he lists the phase aspect as a separate step, that he was
> using it to "smear" the harmonics in a different way to alter or
> increase the complexity of the effect that he obtains with the previous
> step.
After close reading, I don't think that the randomness smears the
harmonics (since the complex spectrum might be changing, but not the real
spectrum--where we actually hear the sounds) but instead does two things:
1. Preventing beat frquencies due to inconveniently in phase superposition
with itself or the source signal.
2. He has a (reasonable) idea that no instrument can ever produce the
same exact note, so he uses the random phases as an element in supporting
that theory.
Number one would have a dramatic effect if it happened, but number
two is much more subtle and I don't know if my ear is trained enough
to consciously hear it.
Thank you.
-pete
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list