[sdiy] Harmonic bandwidth
Richard Wentk
richard at skydancer.com
Mon Jan 7 20:35:41 CET 2008
On 7 Jan 2008, at 18:08, Ben Lincoln wrote:
> Yes, sorry, I should have phrased what I wrote in a better way. I
> agree that the main part of his approach is to replace pure
> harmonics with clusters of closely-spaced (frequency-wise) sine waves.
The way to do this isn't to resynthesise using a sine bank, but to
resynthesise using noise passed through a bank of very high Q
filters. Depending on the noise spectrum and the filter Q you can add
different kinds of 'fat'.
> What I meant was that since he lists the phase aspect as a separate
> step, that he was using it to "smear" the harmonics in a different
> way to alter or increase the complexity of the effect that he
> obtains with the previous step.
Slightly randomising either frequency or phase components in an IFFT
creates a chorus effect, providing it's done for the entire duration
of a sample and not just for a single cycle.
A single cycle wavetable oscillator cannot reproduce this kind of
fat, by definition, because it's a dynamic and not a static effect.
The chorus/fat effect is created by constantly varying changes in
phase and frequency, not the static distribution of the overtones.
Richard
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list