[sdiy] "Living VCOs" PCB in 2009 ?

[Simon Brouwer]

JH. schreef:
>>> I would even go further and say: forget the waveforms.
>>>
>>>       
>> Then the "some of that early Moog and EMS character" would be due to its
>> tuning/tracking characteristics alone.
>>     
>
> Well, if waveform is secondary, then it's frequency that remains.
> Don't know if what you mean by tuning and tracking covers all that frequency 
> could depend of. (What about time?)
>   
Do you mean variation of the frequency with time? Or, as it says on your 
web page, "randomness", "unstability", "instability" or "noisyness".
If that is what you mean I think this "character" is not for me. I would 
prefer a VCO that is stable and clean in the first place where you can 
add a controllable amount of randomness, noise etc.

-- 
Vriendelijke groet, 
Simon Brouwer. 

| http://nl.openoffice.org | http://www.opentaal.org |