[sdiy] more-pole filter
Richard Wentk
richard at skydancer.com
Mon Aug 11 01:04:46 CEST 2008
On 10 Aug 2008, at 23:42, Antti Huovilainen wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Aug 2008, Richard Wentk wrote:
>
>> Surprisingly, also not a huge difference in sound between a 4 pole
>> and 8 pole. Obviously there's *some* difference, but it's not as
>> musically distinctive as you might expect.
>>
>> Considering the huge extra complexity involved in making an
>> accurate 8 pole design, it's never been worth the time, money or
>> effort.
>
> What would be the problem with the accuracy for higher filter orders?
> I don't see how a Moog filter (for example) would be complicated by
> adding more stages.
Higher orders are more susceptible to variations from component
tolerances and thermal issues.
So if you duplicate a four pole, you'll get an eight-ish pole filter,
because the poles will start to smear out from their ideal positions.
This is most obvious with higher Q.
It's probably not obvious enough to make a big sonic difference. But
it depends how picky you want to be.
Richard
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list