[sdiy] On cloning, and the Oberheim VCO

John Mahoney jmahoney at gate.net
Tue Apr 15 05:28:13 CEST 2008


At 05:07 PM 4/14/2008, Aaron Lanterman wrote:

>Wow... sounds like it would be better to stay away from it. Going
>along the pseudo-Van Halen interest theme, I think I'll steer him
>towards the Oberheim VCF, adding voltage controlled resonance to it (I
>know that's been done a million times, but it's still a good exercise,
>and it's a circuit I understand much much better).

Would the OB-X VCO be any easier? They are also discrete and are more 
closely to the "Jump" synth then the SEM. (Was it an OB-X or Xa?) 
Maybe they are so close to the SEM that they are no simpler to clone.

John 


-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG. 
Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.13/1377 - Release Date: 4/14/2008 9:26 AM





More information about the Synth-diy mailing list