AW(Magnus): [sdiy] analogue phase modulation

[Magnus Danielson]

From: harrybissell at copper.net
Subject: Re: AW(Magnus): [sdiy] analogue phase modulation
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 18:38:09 -0000
Message-ID: <380-22007151218389347 at copper.net>

> You should adopt "vertical development"
> as a bench strategy...
> 
> H^) harry PHD   (... Pile it higher, and deeper)

I already have a very successfull strategy on doing that, that's why I said I
have a _negative_ spare area. :-)

The new full-heigth 19" rack doesn't really help. It is filling up quickly as
it is and still not leaving enought spare room on the desk. Sigh.

Cheers,
Magnus

> 
> >
> >
> >
> >---- Original Message ----
> >From: cfmd at bredband.net
> >To: ijfritz at comcast.net
> >Subject: Re: AW(Magnus): [sdiy] analogue phase modulation
> >Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 18:22:22 +0100 (CET)
> >
> >>From: Ian Fritz <ijfritz at comcast.net>
> >>Subject: Re: AW(Magnus): [sdiy] analogue phase modulation
> >>Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:05:36 -0700
> >>Message-ID: <6.2.1.2.2.20070112100314.0211ce90 at mail.comcast.net>
> >>
> >>> At 09:27 AM 1/12/2007, Magnus Danielson wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> >Actually no, not more stable than the VCO has. What you do care
> >about is that
> >>> >it is the same +/- 15V as the VCO and that the +15 V and -15 V is
> >mirror
> >>> >images around ground, but that you want anyway.
> >>> 
> >>> This might be a good place for a rail-to-rail opamp, otherwise you
> >won't 
> >>> get the +/- 15V swing, and what you do get might not be
> >symmetrical.
> >>
> >>If you read back, you will find that I've already pointed this out.
> >>
> >>> But why don't you actually *build* one Magnus???
> >>
> >>Currently there is negative spare area on my lab-bench, OK? :)
> >>
> >>Cheers,
> >>Magnus
>