[sdiy] SV: Civility on the List

[karl dalen]

Geeeee, this is pretty much unbelievable! Wierd!

Grant!

Pardon me but how and from what do you draw your conclushions really?

You always seams to attack people without checking what people
actually meant in the first place, then jump into the closet and 
hide any further discussions!?

Or are you high on something lately???

1:My mail was about the *list* being stone dead again because
of some *server* or other malfunctions on the net, not people
being stone dead and not about im not getting any replies on
my questions.

How the hell did you came to that anti conclusion????????????????

2:I said HA...HA...HA with a :-) because the only mail that
i could see from the list was yours and Ians, and i tought
there was some PREVIOUS discussing going on that i had missed!

Are you just taking advantage of the situation that many
messages don't go trough to and from the list to express
your innermost complaints or have you not gotten the picture
of what megahom, Karl Ekdhal and i was in reality discussing?

We thought messages are not going trough to the list! Capish!? 

Reg
KD

(other people(Ian for one) has expressed that something are
funny with the **list server** or something else somewhere
else on the net!)


--- Grant Richter <grichter at asapnet.net> skrev:

> This list was populated with the most highly respected specialized  
> experts on the PLANET. Many of the rest are people with degrees or  
> advanced degrees.
> University degrees are good place to start, if you then add to that  
> years of personally funded original research.
> 
> Flat out contradicting known and respected experts is silly and makes  
> the contradicting poster look stupid. I sadly watched the  
> exasperation level of the real experts raise over the years. I know  
> who the expert posters are, because I do background checks and read  
> their web pages before responding.
> 
> The "because I said so" attitude is completely unacceptable in a peer  
> review setting. If you are not willing to justify inflated  
> performance claims with published factual data, then don't post them.  
> You just look foolish by doing so.
> 
> I respectfully suggest that posters consider the emotional impact of  
> their posts, and develop their diplomatic skills in general. If we  
> can not maintain the civility I would expect from a person to person  
> professional conference, then this list has lost the ability to  
> advance the state of the art in synthesis.
> 
> In Closing: Cloning existing designs part by part is not an  
> advancement in the state of the art of synthesis. Only applying  
> original thinking to existing ideas can produce new avenues of  
> research. For this, I heartily salute Prof. Lanterman who is teaching  
> this methodology to his students.
> 
> On Apr 23, 2007, at 10:12 AM, karl dalen wrote:
> 
> > Yes, the list appears to be stone dead!
> > Time to run the backuplist again i suppose!
> >
> > Your next message didnt appear!
> >
> > KD
> >
> > --- megaohm <megaohm1 at gmail.com> skrev:
> >
> >> I read you. Karl. Are you having trouble posting to SDIY? I am,  
> >> too. See my
> >> next messege (hopefully) .
> >>
> >> p.
> >>
> >> On 4/22/07, karl dalen <dalenkarl at yahoo.se> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> bla, bla, bla ,bla.....testing 123!
> >>>
> >>> KD
> >>>




      __________________________________________________________
Hitta din nästa resa på Yahoo! Shopping.
Jämför pris på flygbiljetter och hotellrum här: http://shopping.yahoo.se/b/a/c_169901_resor_biljetter.html