[sdiy] x0xb0x, yay

[gregory zifcak]

huh, interesting. so just at high resonance settings the filter frequency is 
modulated more deeply? i'd be curious to hear an example comparison. so 
theoretically if you make the env depth and accent more pronounced at high 
resonance settings you'd have the same result (more separation between vco 
pitch and filter frequency)?
greg

>From: "Jeff Farr" <moogah at gmail.com>
>To: synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl
>Subject: Re: [sdiy] x0xb0x, yay
>Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:48:20 -0500
>
>On 12/12/06, gregory zifcak <zifcak at hotmail.com> wrote:
>>by "pitch" of the resonance, do you mean filter frequency? and the cv 
>>signal
>>would be env and accent? so would that just mean the filter frequency is
>>modulated to a greater degree with a low gain transistor?
>
>Not quite, I mean that at hight res settings the filter rings out at a
>higher pitch as the gain of Q8 gets lower, the extra separation
>between the fundamental of the VCO and the frequency that the filter
>rings at has alot to do with the "liquidyness" and squelchyness of the
>filter, IMO.

_________________________________________________________________
Visit MSN Holiday Challenge for your chance to win up to $50,000 in Holiday 
cash from MSN today!  
http://www.msnholidaychallenge.com/index.aspx?ocid=tagline&locale=en-us