[sdiy] Wavetable lengts during scan!
Harry Bissell Jr
harrybissell at prodigy.net
Fri Aug 4 17:44:50 CEST 2006
Not exactly so...
One of the address inputs does this but the
other select ~can~ cause glitches
I figured out that you might add a small
amount of hysteresis by taking the 4 bit select,
using a D/A converter on them... and feed back a
portion into the input to the A/D converter.
(not built but tested in simulation OK)
You could do this digitally as well (but it
is not easy)
Or with a PIC (which might be easy but not super
fast)
This can be a problem if you sweep the waves with a
very slow source (LFO or ENV GEN)
Still... its a very cool toy
H^) harry
--- mark verbos <mverbos at earthlink.net> wrote:
> the Wiard Miniwave has a zero crossing detector so
> there are no clicks
> when using it as a wavetable oscillator.
>
> Mark
>
>
>
>
> Paul Maddox wrote:
> > Karl,
> >
> >> I wonder how long should a wavetable be to avoid
> >> the *gritting/grinding/stepping sound during
> adress
> >> scan trough the table?
> >>
> >> Im not talking about * jumps between complete
> waves
> >> as a method of scan, and there is no
> interpolation possible.
> >>
> >> The length i have at the moment is 127 stepps and
> its
> >> grinding.
> >
> >
> > I use 256 samples per wave on the monowave,
> ideally I'd go for 1024, but
> > that takes a lot of space and *very* fast main
> oscillator :-)
> >
> > When it comes to 'scnaning' through a table,
> > I'd use tables with lots of waves (I'd say 255
> waves as a minimum)
> > and make sure you *ONLY* switch to the next wave
> at the zero crossing
> > point (Waldorf Wave is the only wavetable synth
> I've heard that does
> > this, and the effect when moving through a table
> is a *lot* smoother).
> >
> > Paul
> >
>
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list