[sdiy] Wavetable lengts during scan!

[Sean Costello]

This was for digital systems with fixed sampling rates, so the number of
steps would have been a variable factor depending on the desired sine
frequency.

Sean Costello

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "karl dalen" <dalenkarl at yahoo.se>
To: "Sean Costello" <seancostello2003 at comcast.net>; "SynthDIY"
<synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl>
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 4:55 PM
Subject: SV: Re: [sdiy] Wavetable lengts during scan!


> Notify me if you find out the amount of
> interpolation stepps used between
> actuall scan stepps.
>
> KD
>
> --- Sean Costello <seancostello2003 at comcast.net> skrev:
>
> > F. Richard Moore wrote an article on this topic, that is in Foundations
of
> > Computer Music. Unfortunately, I have packed that book for my upcoming
move,
> > so I can't access the info. The only upshot I remember was that a table
> > length of 256 was good, provided you also used linear interpolation.
> >
> > Sean Costello
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "karl dalen" <dalenkarl at yahoo.se>
> > To: "SynthDIY" <synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl>
> > Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 12:56 PM
> > Subject: [sdiy] Wavetable lengts during scan!
> >
> >
> > > I wonder how long should a wavetable be to avoid
> > > the *gritting/grinding/stepping sound during adress
> > > scan trough the table?
> > >
> > > Im not talking about * jumps between complete waves
> > > as a method of scan, and there is no interpolation possible.
> > >
> > > The length i have at the moment is 127 stepps and its
> > > grinding.
> > >
> > > KD
> > >
> >
> >
>